Skip To Main Content

Desktop Search Container

Our Schools

Language

Sticky Right Buttons

Landing Nav

Breadcrumb

Task Force Shares Feasibility Findings for Spinning and Waller Road Elementary Schools

Collage of SCUT Photos

On Friday, December 12, the School Capacity and Utilization Task Force presented a feasibility report to the Puyallup School Board during a study session. The presentation summarized fall 2025 work focused on Spinning Elementary and Waller Road Elementary, two schools with aging facilities, limited permanent capacity, and continued reliance on portable classrooms. The update reflected more than three months of analysis and discussion. No decisions were made, and the Task Force did not make recommendations regarding school closures

The purpose of the presentation was to outline potential operational and student impacts should either building ever reach a point where it could no longer be maintained. 

Why the Study Was Conducted 

The Board directed the Task Force to conduct a feasibility study following the April 2025 bond measure, which received majority voter support but did not meet the supermajority requirement for passage. Both Spinning and Waller Road had been recommended for replacement in prior Bond Advisory Committee work due to their Building Condition Assessment scores of 40 percent, the lowest in the district. 

Spinning Elementary was established in the late 1800s, with the current main structure built in 1935 and subsequent additions completed through 1977. The last full modernization occurred in 1985. Waller Road Elementary, originally constructed in 1920 with additions in 1936 and 1960, was also last modernized in 1985. Both schools have undersized core facilities, including libraries, cafeterias, and gym spaces, and rely on portable classrooms to serve current enrollment. 

While the district’s 2024 Capital Levy includes life-cycle improvements at both schools, those upgrades are limited in scope and do not address long-term replacement needs. Both schools also qualify for state match funding should a future modernization or replacement project move forward. 

 

Who Participated 

The School Capacity and Utilization Task Force include parents, students, community members, school principals, and representatives from district departments such as facilities planning, construction, transportation, operations, special education, communications, and the Puyallup Education Association. For this study, participants from Spinning and Waller Road were included to provide school-specific context and feedback. 

The Task Force met five times between September 30 and December 2, totaling 10 hours of discussion and analysis. 

What the Task Force Studied 

A feasibility study is a fact-finding exercise. It examines potential impacts on students, families, staffing, transportation, programs, and facilities. The Task Force does not make decisions or recommendations regarding whether a school remains open or closed. 

For this work, the Task Force evaluated three alternative housing scenarios involving Waller Road Elementary only, Spinning Elementary only, or both schools simultaneously. The analysis considered enrollment projections, capacity at receiving schools, transportation routes, staffing impacts, program placement, and the feasibility and cost of relocating portable classrooms. 

Standard planning assumptions were applied across all scenarios. The review considered student experience factors, core facility limitations such as kitchens and gyms, neighborhood connections, and established feeder patterns. 

Program impacts were reviewed for QUEST, Dual Language, special education services, and Transitional Kindergarten. Sixth grade relocation options to junior high schools, including Aylen and Kalles, were also analyzed. 

Analysis Factors Across All Scenarios: 

  • Enrollment projections and capacity at receiving schools 
  • Transportation routes and staffing impacts 
  • Program placement needs, including QUEST, Dual Language, special education, and Transitional Kindergarten 
  • Feasibility and cost of portable classroom move (approximately $350,000 per unit) 
  • Core facility limitations, such as libraries, cafeterias, and gyms 
  • Students experience considerations 
  • Neighborhood connections and feeder patterns 
  • Sixth grade relocation options to junior highs, such as Kalles 

Feasibility Scenarios Reviewed 

The scenarios presented were not recommendations for board action. They were designed to help the Board understand operational and student impacts if either building were ever to reach a point where it could no longer be maintained. 

Scenarios Presented to the Board: 

Waller Road Elementary Only 

This scenario examined what would be required if Waller Road Elementary were no longer able to serve students while maintaining alignment within the Aylen Junior High feeder system. 

  • Shift resident Waller Road sixth grade students, along with sixth graders from Fruitland, Karshner, and Maplewood, to Aylen Junior High, requiring two additional portable classrooms 
  • Reassign K-5 students from neighborhood tracts 206, 207, 216, and 217 to Fruitland Elementary, requiring two additional portable classrooms 
  • Reassign K-5 students from tracts 213, 214, and 215 to Maplewood Elementary 
  • Reassign K-5 students from tract 228 to Karshner Elementary 
  • Students currently attending Waller Road Elementary through an approved waiver would need to reapply through the waiver application process to a school with available capacity, unless attending their school of assignment. 
Move 6th grade student to Aylen

 

K-5 students to Fruitland

 

K-5 student move to Maplewood

 

K-5 Students to Karshner

 

Spinning Elementary Only 

Two options were presented for Spinning Elementary. These options are mutually exclusive. 

Option F 

  • Shift sixth grade students from Spinning and Shaw Road to Kalles Junior High, requiring three additional portable classrooms 
  • Reassign all Spinning K-5 students to Shaw Road Elementary, requiring two additional portable classrooms 
  • Students currently attending Spinning Elementary through an approved waiver would need to reapply through the waiver application process to a school with available capacity, unless attending their school of assignment. 
Spinning Plan C

Option C 

  • Reassign students from tract 20 to Meeker Elementary 
  • Reassign students from tract 22 to Stewart Elementary 
  • Reassign students from tracts 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 31 to Shaw Road Elementary, requiring three additional portable classrooms 
  • Students currently attending Spinning Elementary through an approved waiver would need to reapply through the waiver application process to a school with available capacity, unless attending their school of assignment. 
K-5 students to Shaw Road

 

Combined Scenario 

This scenario examined the impact of applying the Waller Road plan and either Spinning Option C or F at the same time. The analysis modeled combined effects on operations, staffing, transportation, facilities, program continuity, boundary changes, and portable classroom needs. 

Relocating and installing a portable classroom is estimated to cost approximately $350,000 per unit. Portable units with restrooms are estimated at $600,000 each. Additional considerations include core facility capacity, septic system limitations, and available site space at receiving schools. 

“This is complicated work, and each scenario has to be more than just numbers on a spreadsheet,” said Brian Devereux, Director of Facilities Planning. “It’s about what the student experience would look like and how we maintain strong learning environments while managing space responsibly.”   

Study Session and School Closure Process 

The December 12 study session was informational. The Task Force: 

  • Does not make closure decisions 
  • Does not collect public testimony 
  • Provides the Board with data and operational implications only 

Any decision to initiate a school closure study must be made by the School Board and follow Board Policy 6883. That process includes a formal Board vote to initiate a study, formation of a review committee, public notice, Board hearings, community input, and a final Board decision. None of these steps have been initiated. 

Note: As of the December 12 study session, none of these steps have been initiated. 

What’s Next for SCUT 

The Task Force will return to its regular meeting schedule in January 2026 to review districtwide enrollment data based on October 2025 counts. Updated capacity and utilization recommendations will be presented to the School Board in early Spring 2026

Upcoming areas of review include a recommended list of schools for waiver management consideration; potential classroom conversions at Emerald Ridge High School to address continued growth; and the planned Glacier View and Ferrucci junior high boundary review scheduled for implementation no earlier than the 2027-28 school year. 

This ongoing work is intended to ensure district facilities and programs remain aligned with enrollment trends and available space. 

To review past meeting materials or preview upcoming work for the School Capacity and Utilization Task Force, visit http://www.puyallupsd.org/scut
 
Watch the December 12th presentation to the school board:


 

More school construction news . . .